Senate again rejects
expanded spending package
By Lori Montgomery
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday,
June 25, 2010; 1:13 AM - Washington Post
Senate Democrats abandoned on Thursday efforts to provide fresh aid to
cash-strapped state governments and extend emergency unemployment benefits for
millions of jobless workers, leaving in limbo President Obama's push for more
spending to bolster the economy.
The decision came after the Senate failed again to muster 60 votes to advance
a package of tax cuts and emergency economic provisions. Sen. Ben Nelson
(D-Neb.) joined a united Republican caucus in voting to block the measure,
citing concern that even the latest slimmed-down version would expand bloated
budget deficits. The package fell short, 57 to 41.
Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (Nev.) blamed Republican intransigence for
killing the measure and dismissed talk of continuing negotiations, saying the
only path forward would require Republican compromise.
"We've tried and tried. This is our eighth week on this legislation," Reid
said, urging reporters to direct questions about the measure's fate to Minority
Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.). "We are here. We're willing to work."
McConnell, meanwhile, blamed Democrats for the impasse and for refusing to
support a Republican alternative that would have paid for new spending with cuts
elsewhere, reducing future deficits.
"The principle they're defending here is not some program," McConnell said.
"The principle Democrats are defending is that they will not pass a bill unless
it adds to the debt."
Other senior Democrats said they will probably try again to attract GOP
support for the measure, which Obama has called critical to avoiding the layoffs
of hundreds of thousands of state workers and propping up the nation's
still-fragile economic recovery. But after four months of talks, frustrated
senior Democrats said they are likely to delay further action until after the
July 4 recess.
"People are in the mood of letting the dust settle before finding the next
step," said Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (N.D.).
Emergency jobless benefits, which provide up to 99 weeks of income support,
expired June 2. Since then, more than 1.2 million people have had their checks
cut off, according to estimates by the Labor Department. That number is expected
to rise to more than 2 million people by the time Congress returns from its
weeklong break. Unless Congress acts, the program would phase out entirely by
the end of October.
White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said the president would not give up
on the measure. "The President will continue to press Congress to pass this bill
and bring this relief that's critical to our economic recovery," Gibbs said in a
statement.
Advocates for the unemployed vowed to continue fighting for an extension,
saying it makes no sense to abandon people when the unemployment rate is 9.7
percent -- far higher than the cutoff points for emergency unemployment benefits
after previous recessions.
"We've never come close to doing anything like this in the postwar period,"
said Andrew Stettner, deputy director of the National Employment Law Project.
"This is going to cut the heart right out of consumer spending. If they want to
cut short the recovery, this is the best way to do it."
Democrats have been trying to push the package to final passage since at
least March, when an earlier version actually passed the Senate with the support
of six Republicans. That measure would have added nearly $100 billion to budget
deficits over the next decade. It had be reworked because it included several
tax increases that ultimately were used to help pay for Obama's health-care
overhaul.
Since then, concern about the deficit has risen dramatically among lawmakers
in both parties, many of whom will face voters in this fall's midterm elections.
That anxiety hampered efforts to reshape the package, as even some Democrats
demanded that new spending be paid for, forcing Democratic leaders repeatedly to
pare it back.
The latest version, released late Wednesday, would have increased budget
deficits by $33 billion over the next decade -- the cost of extending jobless
benefits through the end of November. Obama's request for $24 billion in state
aid was scaled back to $16 billion and its cost would have been covered by
unspent funds from last year's economic stimulus package, much of it targeted at
the food stamps program.
Other provisions would have been fully paid for, including plans to extend an
array of expiring tax breaks that are hugely popular with many of the nation's
largest business groups. Among the revenue-raising provisions in the measure are
new taxes on investment fund managers and multinational corporations that do business overseas.
So far, business groups have complained loudly about the tax increases but
have done little to build Republican support for the tax cuts. By ceasing work
on the package, Democrats said they hope to prod business groups as well as
Republican governors who need additional federal aid to balance their budgets.
"I frankly hope when Republicans go home, the businesses that want these tax
reductions will scratch their heads and say: 'What were you thinking?' " said
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), where the jobless rate stands at 12.3 percent,
one of the highest in the nation.
If Congress fails to extend emergency benefits, Whitehouse said, "It would be
pretty bad."
Despite the anxiety about spending, Congress managed to take care of one
group of supplicants. Late Thursday, the House voted overwhelmingly to send to
the president a measure that would postpone a 21 percent pay cut for doctors who
see Medicare patients. The $6 billion measure would delay the cut until the end
of this year.
Staff writer Paul Kane contributed to this report.